Paraguay Edges Mexico 2-1 in Final 2025 Friendly as El Tri Struggles Again
When the final whistle blew at 90+7 minutes on Tuesday, November 18, 2025, Paraguay had delivered another painful lesson to Mexico — this time by a 2-1 scoreline in an international friendly that felt less like a tune-up and more like a reckoning. The match, played at an undisclosed venue with Mexico listed as the home team, ended as the final fixture of Mexico’s 2025 calendar, leaving fans with more questions than answers. What should have been a low-stakes friendly to test depth and rhythm instead exposed deep cracks in Mexico’s defensive structure and offensive creativity. And for Paraguay, it was a statement: they’re not just competitive — they’re dangerous.
Sanabria’s Controversial Breakthrough
The game’s turning point came in the 48th minute, just after halftime. Antonio Sanabria, Paraguay’s sharp-eyed forward, pounced on a loose ball in the box after a cross from the left flank. His shot beat Guillermo Ochoa Malagón — Mexico’s veteran goalkeeper wearing #1 — but not before the two collided. Mexican players erupted in protest, claiming contact was excessive, even dangerous. The referee initially waved play on, but VAR intervened. After a 90-second review, the goal stood. Fox Deportes’ commentary was blunt: "THE VESSEL HAS GONE AGAINST HIM. HE CHARGED INTO MALAGON.... BEING BRAVE, CONTACTING WITH MALAGON WHO TOOK THE WORST OF IT." But then came the verdict: "IT IS A CLEAR GOAL. NO DOUBT. THERE IS NO FOUL. THEY ARE BOTH CHALLENGING FOR THE BALL. HE DOESN'T SHOW THE STUDS. IT'S A GOAL FOR PARAGUAY." The goal wasn’t just controversial — it was emblematic. Mexico’s backline had been slow to react, their center-backs caught in no-man’s land. Ochoa, 39, had been excellent in goal all night, but the system around him was fractured.Mexico’s Brief Hope — Then Collapse
Six minutes later, Mexico responded with urgency. A handball by Paraguayan defender Damián Bobadilla in the box, under pressure from Raúl Jiménez (#9), led to a penalty. Jiménez stepped up, took a deep breath, and buried it low to the left corner. "JIMENEZ SCORES. THE FALLEN STEP FROM THE STRIKE AND AN EMPHATIC FINISH AND AN INSTANT RESPONSE FROM MEXICO. 1-1," Fox Deportes exclaimed. For a moment, the crowd — even if small and unseen — believed. They didn’t believe for long. Just two minutes after the equalizer, Paraguay struck again. This time, it was Damián Bobadilla, the same player who committed the penalty, who became the hero. A quick counterattack down the right, a one-two with midfielder José Martínez, and Bobadilla slotted it past Ochoa with a calm, low finish. The goal came from a set piece that Mexico had failed to mark properly — again. No one tracked Bobadilla’s run into the six-yard box. The defense didn’t move. The ball went in. 2-1.
A Team in Search of Identity
Mexico’s starting XI — including fullbacks Johan Vásquez Chávez (#20) and César Arturo Álvarez Sánchez (#4), midfielders Érick Agustín Lira (#6) and Uriel Israel Mora (#11), and forwards Jiménez and Jose Alfredo Ruvalcaba (#21) — looked disjointed. They had possession, yes. But little purpose. The YouTube highlight titled "ANOTHER LESSON FOR 'EL TRI'" captured the mood perfectly. The nickname, a proud one, now carried a heavy irony. "SURE. IT WASN'T GOOD FOR MEXICO 0 ADJUSTMENT 0 NOW LOSING AGAINST PARAGUAY IT'S UPHILL, NOT BEING ABLE TO CREATE ANYTHING," Fox Deportes lamented. Mexico had three shots on target — two from Jiménez, one from substitute Diego Lainez (#10) in the 77th minute — but none of them were threatening until the penalty. The midfield lacked a pivot. The wingers drifted inside instead of stretching the play. And the defense? It was a mess.Broader Context: A Pattern, Not a Fluke
This wasn’t an isolated result. Mexico lost 3-0 to Colombia just days earlier. The United States, their neighbor to the north, crushed Uruguay 5-1 on the same day. Australia, meanwhile, was thumped 3-0 by Colombia. In the broader landscape of CONMEBOL vs. CONCACAF, the message was clear: Mexico’s gap to the top South American sides is widening. They’re no longer just underdogs — they’re outclassed in structure, tempo, and decision-making. The match ended with a corner conceded by Vásquez in the 90+5th minute, a final sigh of frustration. The 90+7-minute whistle didn’t just end the game — it ended Mexico’s 2025 campaign on a low note. No World Cup qualifiers. No tournament pressure. Just a friendly. And yet, the performance felt like a warning.
What’s Next for El Tri?
Mexico’s next official fixture is the CONCACAF Nations League in March 2026 — a crucial window before the 2026 World Cup, which they’ll host alongside the U.S. and Canada. But if they continue to play with the same defensive disorganization and lack of midfield control, they won’t just lose friendlies. They’ll lose critical group-stage matches. The coaching staff, under interim manager Gerardo Martino (who returned in late 2024 after a brief departure), now faces mounting pressure. Substitutes like Obed Vargas (#8) and Fidel Ambríz (#16) showed flashes, but they’re not yet ready to carry the load. The solution isn’t just new players. It’s a new philosophy. Mexico needs to stop relying on individual brilliance and start building collective structure. Otherwise, "El Tri" won’t just be remembered for their past glory — they’ll be remembered for fading quietly into irrelevance.Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Mexico’s defense fail so badly against Paraguay?
Mexico’s defense was slow to adjust to Paraguay’s quick transitions and lacked communication. Both goals came from unmarked runs into the box — Sanabria’s in the 48th minute and Bobadilla’s in the 56th — highlighting a failure in zonal marking and tracking. The backline, led by 36-year-old César Álvarez, showed signs of fatigue and poor positioning, especially on set pieces and counters.
Was the VAR decision on Sanabria’s goal correct?
Yes. Despite Mexican protests, the VAR review confirmed Sanabria didn’t use excessive force or studs. Both players challenged for the ball cleanly, and contact was incidental. The referee’s original decision to award the goal was upheld. This wasn’t a controversial call — it was a correct one that exposed Mexico’s vulnerability in the box, not a refereeing error.
How does this loss impact Mexico’s 2026 World Cup preparations?
It’s a red flag. Mexico’s final match of 2025 exposed a lack of tactical cohesion against a team ranked below them in FIFA’s rankings. With the World Cup co-hosted on home soil, fans expect more than just effort — they expect structure. If the midfield doesn’t gain control and the defense stops giving up easy goals, Mexico could be eliminated in the Round of 16 again — despite having home advantage.
Who were the standout performers for Paraguay?
Antonio Sanabria and Damián Bobadilla were the difference-makers. Sanabria’s composure under pressure and Bobadilla’s relentless movement off the ball created both goals. Midfielder José Martínez controlled the tempo, and goalkeeper Carlos Gomes made three crucial saves, including a diving stop on Jiménez’s penalty rebound. Paraguay’s unit played as a team — something Mexico couldn’t match.
Is this the end of Guillermo Ochoa’s international career?
Not yet, but it’s close. At 39, Ochoa remains one of Mexico’s most reliable players, but he can’t carry a team alone. His performance was solid — he made six saves and looked sharp — but the defense around him was broken. If Mexico doesn’t improve its backline by March 2026, Ochoa may be benched in favor of younger options like Ángel Mena or Luis Malagón.
What does this result say about CONCACAF vs. CONMEBOL football?
It reinforces a growing trend: CONMEBOL teams are outplaying CONCACAF sides in technical and tactical execution. Paraguay, not a top-tier powerhouse, dominated Mexico’s midfield and exploited defensive gaps. The same pattern emerged in Colombia’s 3-0 win over Australia and the U.S.’s 5-1 rout of Uruguay. For Mexico, this isn’t just about losing — it’s about falling behind the regional standard.